litwtch
this hell is better with you

Team Villain Introductory Post!

Team Villain Introductory Post!

(For some reason my previous post had some issues so I’m redoing it)

Villainous Nickname:

Professor Poisonous (AKA Cosmos)

Modus Operandi:

I prefer using quieter methods to get things done, and if I don’t have to be there in person I won’t be! Often, people never even remember a thing thanks to a little so-and-so from my lab or a well placed piece of blackmail. The best way to stay ahead in the villain game is to make sure they never even knew you were there!

About my lair:

My lair is filled with a wide mixture of things including plants and technology. I tend to think of it as an eclectic mix of witchcraft and computers. Why yes that is a fully functioning laboratory in my basement, no you may not touch anything!

My secret weapon:

My little notebook filled with all the delicious secrets people tell me (whether they remember them or not)

What are you most looking forward to about 007 Fest 2023:

Team Villain domination!

Villainous catchphrase:

“Won’t you have some tea?”

Not only can prisoners not vote in the US, once you've been convicted of a felony (a very large category of crimes that prosecutors like to find excuses to fit people into), you can never vote again for the rest of your life.

jazzmouse asked:
demilypyro answered:

Oh that is fucked, that is fucked beyond belief, that shouldn’t be allowed

This is actually not true of the entire US! It depends on the state. When I worked in Ohio, we would encounter people who incorrectly believed they couldn't vote because of past felonies.

16 states allow people with felony convictions to vote once their sentence is complete.

9 states have restrictions on voting rights for people with felon convictions. Some of these are effectively a ban. One of these states is Florida, which passed a referendum to restore voting rights to people with felony convictions who had completed their sentence, but the DeSantis administration has found various loopholes to continue restricting voting.

23 states ban prisoners from voting but allow people with felony convictions to vote if they are not in prison.

2 states, Maine and Vermont, allow everyone to vote.

The ACLU has a map.

OP, I know you're not American and may or may not be interested in this, but it's important for any Americans seeing this to know that depending on where they live they may in fact have the right to vote. Misinformation about this is a form of voter suppression.

Also if you live in a state where prisoners and/or felons can’t vote, CALL YOUR REPS. Start talking to friends and family. Network. Get it on the ballot.

image

🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃

you know what. i am physically sick as hell this week so i'll bite. i read the original slate article, which is free to read so i don't know why OP chose to screenshot instead of let people draw their own conclusions. i agree with MANY of the writer's points on the need for comprehensive criminal justice reform, but i also care a lot about numbers and stats and increasingly, this bullshit "democrats are the same as republicans" messaging is straight-up delivered using propaganda tactics

this is going to be an incredibly long post and i had to use GOOGLE SLIDES and GOOGLE SHEETS which i hate so so much so in the words of twitter kpop stans please don't let this flop

let's look at the numbers, claim by claim

claim #1: "the number of people held in ICE detention has increased by 70 percent since Biden took office"

  • if you click through 3 link layers from the slate you land at cbs as the source for this which tells you that mainstream media is certainly not immune to playing with stats to make the democrats look bad
  • fortunately ICE detention stats are easily publicly available thanks to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, which does the lord's work of crawling through federal agency publications and submitting tedious FOIA requests to collate useful data
  • here is the data -- not only was cbs not wrong about the total number of detainees at the time of publication (25k in aug 2021), but the increase from when biden was inaugurated is actually 90%, not 70%. look:
image
  • well holy shit!!! that's terrible. biden is the worst and he hates immigration reform and the democrats are no different from trump, right?
  • but if you zoom out
image
  • actually, Jan/Feb 2021 was at the absolute low for detainees, after a full year of covid restrictions slowing down or minimizing gov't operations of all kinds AND reducing border volume
  • and if you actually want to compare the biden admin to the trump admin?
image
  • relative to Aug of 2019, after 18 months the biden admin has reached a 56% decrease in the number of detainees. even if you look at only the month before COVID lockdowns really hit, it's still nearly a 40% decrease
  • and to put the total numbers in perspective, at NO point before COVID did the trump admin have fewer than 30k people in ICE detention. most of the time it was well above 40k, or about 2x more than under biden
  • that's not to say that immigration reform isn't still needed, but it IS to say that myopically comparing current-state to january 2021, aka one of the WEIRDEST months statistically on record ever, is going to give you crap perspective

claim #2: "the federal prison population has grown for the first time in a decade"

image
  • (note i've only included data from 2005 onward so it's easier to actually see what's going on in the last 10 years. for those who like math, these are CAGRs calculated over each presidential term)
  • but there it is -- decline in populations accelerated under trump. surely both parties same. surely democrats actually worse than republicans
  • but wait, what's that?
image
  • that can't be ...
image
  • SPIDERS GEORG????
  • WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE
  • ARE YOU SAYING THAT ... THERE IS AN OUTLIER?
  • THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COUNTED?
image
image
  • now that assumes trump wasn't successful at slowing down the momentum from the obama years
  • this is what it might have looked like had we perhaps ended up with a second trump term:
image
  • again this isn't to say that biden is pure and perfect on criminal justice, even if there were some agreed-upon definition of what pure and perfect legislative or policy priorities would look like
  • it's to put the context back into place around the data
  • are the democrats and republicans actually the same or are we being fed a diet of pruned stats and catchphrases to make us simultaneously angry and disempowered

last claim: "federal covid relief funds are being used to pad local police budgets"

image

SO all of that to say

  • we don't stop pushing for immigration or criminal justice reform
  • or any other reform that is sorely needed
  • but using data in incredibly selective ways, out of context, to promote a narrative that somehow democrats are the same or even worse than republicans
  • ESPECIALLY the republicans of today
  • is literally propaganda
  • propaganda by definition uses kernels of truth and then presents it in a biased way to attempt to push a narrative
  • pretending that the democrats are exactly the same as the republicans is propaganda, and i'm like 80% sure it's right-wing propaganda designed to discourage left-wing turnout that has somehow been accepted by an online population that doesn't understand statistics
  • so like
  • understand statistics
  • do a bit of research
  • draw conclusions that you can back up
  • and for fuck's sake, vote

Some time has passed. Have your views changed, at all?

i think this question is for me so i will try to answer briefly, though lmk if it was intended for op lmao

also i'll answer on the assumption it was asked in good faith:

do i still think that democrats and republicans are not the same? yes; i don't have the time today to refresh charts etc., but a very quick glance at the same sources i used the first time around looks like the numbers have remained more or less stable. happy to take correction here if anyone has more time to delve

  • importantly, we are also already seeing the impact of elected democrats at both national and state / local levels. there are many many many sources covering what has been done federally (or attempted in the face of GOP obstructionism) both from mainstream news sources (think NPR, Hill, WaPo, the recently-deservedly-maligned NYT, etc.) and on tumblr itself, so i won't do the google work here
  • at the state level, states that put democrats in power during the midterms are already seeing legislation and orders being put in place for abortion rights and LGBTQ+ protections -- something visible on any map showing where "safe(ish)" states are
  • in michigan alone where dems won a trifecta for the first time in decades we've repealed anti-union legislation, enacted increased background checks for gun purchases, repealed the draconian 1931 abortion law set to take effect post-Roe, and passed protections for sexual orientation and gender identity
  • so much for democrats being the same or worse than republicans

on immigration specifically, do i think reform is still needed? yes; in particular i do think there should be close scrutiny of how the numbers trend as the biden admin continues to announce and enact its proposed policies if the PHE does indeed expire in may

  • with that said, i think any truly focused analysis should consider the context of those numbers as well -- the quick-and-dirty i did looked only at raw numbers, not conditions of detention, enforcement approach, targeted or prioritized nationalities, and many other factors that provide a better picture of what is actually happening at the southern US border

on criminal justice specifically, do i think reform is still needed? yes; and importantly here it's worth keeping track of what the dem white house and dem congresspeople are trying to do vs what is able to happen (e.g. George Floyd Act)

  • i won't get into a long screed here on the need for tumblr and voters broadly to understand how laws get passed (or don't get passed bc they get stuck eternally in committee) but even pre-midterms we had valuable laws trapped in congressional deadlock. midterm losses weren't nearly as bad as they could have been, but it's still a tighter margin with a deeply-intractable set of republicans -- whose inaction should be emphasized and considered when it comes time to vote
  • it's also worth noting that the comparison here is between a party that on average acknowledges racial disparity in policing even if they don't always agree on the approach / align with the leftmost demands on how to address the problem vs a party that on average openly courts cop unions, openly calls protestors rioters and terrorists, frequently denies that racial disparities even exist, and proudly yells "blue lives matter"
  • like yeah, the bar is in the ground. but do we want to be in the ground with it or actually trying to get some lift-off?
  • comparison also applies to immigration point above tbh i am just disorganized today and didn't write it there

do i still think dems-and-repubs-are-the-same reeks of voter-suppression propaganda? yes, and even more so when the evidence continues to pile up that dem legislatures and leaders at every level are making real progress on issues that we all purport to care about. who benefits when certain types of voters feel like their vote doesn't matter? the people who want to disenfranchise them!

do i still think it's important to contextualize data and question sources and stats? yes!!!!!!!!!! yes!!!! and i know it's not easy and it's time-consuming, but again: who benefits when we don't approach information with a critical mind? not us!

  • this doesn't mean we (collectively, as voters, as well as specifically voters on the left) are always going to agree -- but the more we can approach disagreements using the same set of facts, the more we can have a meaningful debate on what can actually be done instead of what is even reality

do i still think it's important to vote? yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

  • again i won't get into what could be a long screed here, but we are already seeing what can happen when we get left-leaning politicians into office
  • i specify left-leaning as opposed to any specific set of political beliefs because i know there is no such thing as a perfect politician, even putting aside the fact that nobody would be able to agree on what a perfect politician would believe or do
  • but incremental progress is still progress -- and voting is as much a form of feedback for legislators as it is a demand, which is to say if you have a democrat who has done things you like? reward them by voting for them again! have they missed some things? call up their office and say "as someone who voted for [x], i'm disappointed by [y]" -- it's MUCH more effective than complaining as a non-voter
  • our current political context is also particularly important here -- there are times when it's valuable to have a slimmer margin to keep both parties on their toes. right now however one party is doing everything it can to leap off the deep end and it's more valuable to deliver some security to the party that isn't so it doesn't feel as much of a need to tread carefully and court the mid-right and can take firmer leftward stances
  • in other words we have got to stop thinking of politicians as individuals acting on individual preferences. they get elected to represent a set of priorities indicated by voters -- but if a portion of those voters doesn't show up, how are they supposed to prioritize or even know about those people's issues? vibes????
  • look, for all the many foibles of the US system, it remains a fact that the right to vote is one of the most powerful tools a citizenry can have
  • you actually get to show up and tell your government -- local, state, federal -- whether you're pissed off. and they have to hear it!
  • there is a reason status quo groups want to prevent more people from voting -- because it's powerful and they know it! why let them take that power from us?

am i still going to abuse bullet points? yeah

  • i'm not sorry about it
  • i've made so many slide decks in my life
  • i've earned this
  • i am sorry i made this post even longer though. sorry to anyone who has 'keep reading' turned off

image

thought they needed a little reminder that they still have far more to lose if they double down on this stupidity.

spread the word, it seems they're... very forgetful about this.

A small collection (feel free to add):

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

@staff You're not very subtle.

it's so wild when people complain about religious inclusion like "oh so you think THEY should get special privileges/accommodations to do x, y, or z??"

and the things they're talking about are like. exceptions to rules or norms that in themselves shouldn't exist. yes Richard, we actually should have diverse meal options at work events to accommodate people with different diets. yes, people should be allowed to take time off to be with their family during whatever holidays or life events they so choose. yes, people should be able to wear clothing that makes them comfortable. nobody should be happy about these restrictions existing. stop bitching about the singular jewish or muslim person in your workplace and realize that everyone deserves better.

I had an interesting experience recently, which I feel like culturally Christian people might benefit from hearing about. I've been recently in the process of helping to plan an event. Many attendees at this event keep kosher. Since kashrut is a very specialized dietary restriction, which I know not all venues can accommodate, my first question to all of the potential venues I've looked into has been "do you allow outside kosher catering vendors, or otherwise have some way to allow for kosher catering?"

One of the venues I reached out to replied that they were "capable of providing for our dietary needs." Now, since I'd asked about several possible catering options, and since they'd only replied generally and without actually specifying which they were saying they could do, I was a bit suspicious. So I followed up, and asked what exactly they meant by that: did they allow outside caterers in general? or did they have a specific kosher catering partner? or could they actually cater kosher food themselves? what?

Their answer was – and I swear I'm not making this up – that they didn't allow any outside caterers, and couldn't cater any food which was actually kosher, but that they could provide us with a menu that included "knishes" and "potato, pancakes" [sic], and so hey, that was basically the same as providing for our dietary needs, wasn't it?

Now here's the thing:

The dietary restriction shared by the most people at this event is keeping kosher, but one of the attendees, who doesn't keep kosher, has a severe peanut allergy. If we had done what we were planning to do and simply specified "peanut free", and if the venue had decided, like they were apparently willing to do for the kosher food, "well ok, it's not actually peanut free, but it's mostly peanut free, and that's basically the same thing"? They could have literally killed her. And if I hadn't specifically asked, in detail, about kosher catering first, I might never have known about how lax they were about providing for dietary restrictions in general.

Now could we have explained the nuances of kosher restrictions to this venue and tried again? Yes, possibly. But their unwillingness to even try on the first pass made it abundantly clear that they were not a safe venue to work with on allergy grounds. We crossed the venue off our list immediately, and I reached out to other people in the area who I knew might be planning similar events in the future, and warned them to never use this venue, either.

Accommodations like this are instances of the curb cut effect. If you don't personally have a diet or a family obligation or clothing needs that need accommodating, it's easy to get annoyed at the people you see who are loudest about asking for those accommodations. But having those options available helps everyone, and the fact that some workplaces and and businesses and event vendors refuse to accommodate these needs should be a red flag to everyone.

Maybe you don't care about kosher or hallal food. Maybe you've never had reason to take off work at an unusual time of year, and maybe you've never wanted or needed to wear anything unusual. But today it's your Jewish or Muslim coworker, and tomorrow it could be you or someone you care about – with a surprise medical diagnosis that limits your diet, or with a sudden family emergency at an inconvenient time of year, or with a sensory problem you've struggled with your entire life but can no longer mask, or who knows what else. We all deserve better, and the people who are openly saying so are not your enemies.

Conservatives now outraged about the idea of teaching kids empathy.


https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTR7fUTaf/

The quiet part couldn't get any louder. She's just... saying this with get full chest.

You can't make this up.

They make fun of Millennials every other week like "Millennials canceling paper towels. Millennials canceling diamonds." Then they go out and try to cancel... kids learning empathy?

So confused.

-fae

This is some full fledged white people shit.

"Giving a damn about others is a sin"

This is the most individualist nuclear family white people shit I've ever heard.

-fae

you guys know you can get USB connectable CD, dvd, and blu-ray players right. and you can buy external hard drives with crazy amounts of space for an amount of money that would make the average person from 2009’s head explode bc of how cheap it is. and if you do this and get ripping software such as handbrake for CDs and DVDs and makeMKV for blurays you can both own a physical copy of whatever media you want and make it accessible to yourself no matter where you are. do you guys know this

ever since my gf and i moved in together a couple years ago i've been semi-regularly executing something i call a "prank night." this is something you want to do frequently enough that it's not a special occasion, but spontaneously enough to make it a prank. the set-up for a prank night is simple

  1. listen to your partner and take note of a couple things she's putting off doing, as well as a couple things she's been wanting
  2. wait for a day when your partner is out of the house for work or errands
  3. tell them that you'll be playing videogames/hanging out with the guys/doing very little all day. this way her guard will be down

now you can execute the four core aspects of the prank night

  1. act of service. complete a chore or task that you know she's been dreading. doing the dishes/cleaning the living room/making an appointment/doing the groceries, etc.
  2. lil gift. flowers, chocolate, anything that you know she wants but hasn't felt justified in getting for herself
  3. sustenance. a charcuterie board, a homecooked meal, her favorite snack, or a fancy cocktail can all work
  4. fourth, final, most important, when she gets home you sit her down and eat her out like she's your last meal on death row

The Look On The Girlfriend's Face Will Be Awesome!

it's actually terrifying how quickly the concept of self care (originally a radical concept rooted in the black panther party's efforts to support other black ppl living through racism) became another tool of self-management which is viewed as both a moral obligation + an individual responsibility. businesses + employers + other institutions now easily wield it as a progressive way to say "if you're upset about xyz, make yourself get over it". "we are going to treat you like shit + you need to learn how to cope with that or else you're doing something wrong"

i have seen job listings where "ability to practice self care" was listed as a requirement for employment. as a case worker, we were repeatedly drilled on "self-care" as a response to unconscionably high case loads, traumatizing experiences, dead end job obligations, + poor living conditions due to subpar pay/high stress. my clients would go to appointments regarding their evictions, food insecurity, active domestic violence situations, etc + receive tips on "self care" without any tangible community, legal, or structural support to follow.

everyone absolutely deserves to care for themselves + it is useful to circulate affirmations + advice on how to do this. this should happen within communities, through a sincere concern/love for one another, as a way of helping everyone live the best life possible while we work towards total liberation. it should not be a replacement for caring for one another!!! it should be one of many ways of caring for one another!!!

a publisher reached out to me about doing a foraging book and I just like

no one wants that book i'd write, it would just be an entire book about all the different land use histories of urban spaces and why they're full of heavy metals. the plants I *want* to write and draw about would practically be a footnote compared to the worried-auntie-warnings

Before 1978, many hourse paints contained lead Leaded gasoline was phased out starting in the 1970s Lead can stay in soil for thousands of years You can be exposed to lead working in contaminated soils Lead can accurate in roots and on the surface of leaves Test for lead if gardening near a house older than 1978, or near a road that was busy before around 1980. You can request a lead test as part of your soil testALT

i insisted on including lead in the gardening book because I gotta

a publisher reached out to me about doing a foraging book and I just like

no one wants that book i'd write, it would just be an entire book about all the different land use histories of urban spaces and why they're full of heavy metals. the plants I *want* to write and draw about would practically be a footnote compared to the worried-auntie-warnings

Before 1978, many hourse paints contained lead Leaded gasoline was phased out starting in the 1970s Lead can stay in soil for thousands of years You can be exposed to lead working in contaminated soils Lead can accurate in roots and on the surface of leaves Test for lead if gardening near a house older than 1978, or near a road that was busy before around 1980. You can request a lead test as part of your soil testALT

i insisted on including lead in the gardening book because I gotta